Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Use of nicotine products and withdrawal support among personnel of the Finnish Defence Forces
  1. Maria Danielsson1,2,
  2. A Lammi3,
  3. P Sandström3,
  4. S Siitonen2,
  5. J-P Ruohola2,
  6. J Ollgren4,
  7. L Pylkkänen5,6 and
  8. T Vasankari3,7
  1. 1Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  2. 2Finnish Defence Forces, Helsinki, Finland
  3. 3Finnish Lung Health Association, Filha Ry, Helsinki, Finland
  4. 4National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
  5. 5Finnish Medicines Agency Fimea, Helsinki, Finland
  6. 6Department of Oncology, University of Turku Faculty of Medicine, Turku, Finland
  7. 7Department of Pulmonary Diseases and Clinical Allergology, University of Turku Faculty of Medicine, Turku, Finland
  1. Correspondence to Maria Danielsson; maria.danielsson{at}helsinki.fi

Abstract

Introduction While the health hazards of smoking are well known, the harmful effects of smokeless tobacco (snus) and other nicotine products remain less familiar. This study investigates the prevalence and habits of tobacco use among Finnish Defence Forces (FDF) personnel, focusing on the use of snus and preferred withdrawal support.

Methods An electronic questionnaire survey was conducted among FDF personnel in 2014 and 2020. The response rates were 18% in 2014 (n=2386) and 27% in 2020 (n=3373). The study examined demographic factors, smoking, snus and e-cigarette use, and preferences for withdrawal support.

Results Daily smoking decreased significantly from 14% in 2014 to 6% in 2020, while daily snus use increased from 8% to 11%. E-cigarette use remained low (<1% in 2020). The highest prevalence of snus use was among military personnel working with conscripts. About a quarter of snus users (27%) used snus with a nicotine content of 11–20 mg/g and 30% used snus with a nicotine content of 21–30 mg/g. Preferred withdrawal support included nicotine replacement therapy or medication provided by the employer. A significant number of both smokers and snus users did not receive advice to quit from healthcare professionals.

Conclusions Tobacco use among FDF personnel shows a decrease in smoking but an increase in snus use. There is a need for targeted cessation support programmes, with an emphasis on professional advice and employer-provided nicotine replacement therapy. Increased involvement of healthcare professionals in advising quitting could significantly enhance cessation rates.

  • Military Personnel
  • OCCUPATIONAL & INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE
  • PUBLIC HEALTH
  • EPIDEMIOLOGY

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to unpublished material that will be used in future publications but is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to unpublished material that will be used in future publications but is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors MD, AL, PS, SS, JO, LP and TV participated in designing the study. The acquisition of data was conducted by MD, AL, PS, SS, LP and TV. The study was conducted by MD, TV, AL, PS and SS. The first draft was prepared by MD. All statistical analyses were done by MD and JO. MD, AL, JO, LP, and TV contributed to the interpretation of data, reporting, writing, and editing of the manuscript. MD, AL, PS, SS, J-PR, JO, LP and TV read and approved the final version of the manuscript. The guarantor is MD.

  • Funding This study was funded by Maanpuolustuksen kannatussäätiö.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.