Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Self-reported hormonal contraceptive use in the British Armed Forces
  1. Sarah J Myers1,
  2. T J O’Leary1,2,
  3. R Knight1 and
  4. J P Greeves1,2,3
  1. 1Army Health and Performance Research, UK Ministry of Defence, London, UK
  2. 2Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
  3. 3Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor J P Greeves; Julie.Greeves143{at}mod.gov.uk

Abstract

Introduction Hormonal contraceptives contain synthetic oestrogens and/or progestogens that can alter the endogenous production of oestradiol and progesterone, which potentially affect aspects of health and performance important for military employment. The nature of military service—operating away from home for prolonged periods, often in austere environments—might influence the choice of hormonal contraceptives of servicewomen. Hormonal contraceptive use and the primary reasons for use in British servicewomen are poorly understood.

Methods All trained servicewomen in the UK Armed Forces (N=14 500) with an active email were invited to respond to an online questionnaire. The questionnaire asked about demographics, current hormonal contraceptive use and reasons for choosing to use hormonal contraceptives. The survey was open for 3 months.

Results A total of 3395 servicewomen completed the questionnaire (23% response rate). Hormonal contraceptives were currently used by 58% of servicewomen. The most common methods were the contraceptive pill (20% of all respondents) and the intrauterine system (17%). The main reasons for using hormonal contraceptives were to prevent pregnancy (78%) and to control or stop the menstrual cycle (61%).

Conclusions A high proportion of UK servicewomen use hormonal contraceptives, particularly younger women, with the contraceptive pill the most popular method. The high proportion of women using hormonal contraceptives to control or stop menstrual bleeding is likely determined by the unique cultural and environmental barriers of military employment.

  • Military Personnel
  • REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE
  • General endocrinology

Data availability statement

The data sets generated and/or analysed during this study are not publicly available as they are held under licence by the Ministry of Defence; however, they are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and with permission of the Ministry of Defence.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

The data sets generated and/or analysed during this study are not publicly available as they are held under licence by the Ministry of Defence; however, they are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and with permission of the Ministry of Defence.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • X @JulieGreeves

  • Contributors RK, TJO'L and JPG designed and conducted the study. TJO'L analysed the data. SJM produced the manuscript. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the data, edited the content and approved the final version. JPG serves as the guarantor of this study and takes full responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

  • Funding This study was funded by the Ministry of Defence (Army). The authors declare that the study sponsor played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

  • Competing interests RK, SJM and TJO'L are employed by the UK Ministry of Defence as defence scientists. JPG is employed by the UK Ministry of Defence as a principal scientist and defence principal investigator on this trial.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.