Article Text

Download PDFPDF
One Health: opportunities for Defence Engagement (Health)
  1. Rebecca L Graves1,
  2. J Whitaker2 and
  3. K Clay3
  1. 1 Strategic Centre, British Army Land Forces Headquarters, Andover, UK
  2. 2 Department of Vascular Surgery, Royal Free Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
  3. 3 Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to Mrs Rebecca L Graves, Strategic Centre, Blenheim Building, Army Headquarters, Andover, Hampshire, UK; beccylgraves{at}gmail.com

Abstract

The One Health concept continues to gain traction as a necessary approach to tackle emerging threats to human, animal and environmental health but has not yet been adopted within Defence Engagement (Health). The health of humans, animals and ecosystems are closely interlinked. The One Health concept recognises this interdependence and seeks to balance and optimise the health of all three through an integrated and unifying approach. With a focus on zoonoses, vectorborne disease, antimicrobial resistance and food safety it encourages collaboration, communication, coordination and capacity building. The UK has made commitments to the One Health approach in the Global Health and Security Agenda, and the Integrated Review. This article explores how the One Health approach could and should be adopted within Defence Engagement (Health) activity to offer the potential for high-impact, low-risk activity while facilitating long-term relationship building.

  • INFECTIOUS DISEASES
  • Public health
  • Tropical medicine
  • MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING
  • PARASITOLOGY
  • PUBLIC HEALTH

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors RLG and JW conceived of the article. RLG wrote the first draft. All authors have contributed to revisions, reviewed and approve the final version.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests RLG, JW and KC are serving members of the UK Armed Forces. All authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.