Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Diet quality is associated with nutrition knowledge and physical activity in the US military veterans enrolled in university programmes
  1. Laura A Robinson1,2,
  2. C R Colin3,
  3. K S Smith4,
  4. M W Greene2 and
  5. A D Frugé1
  1. 1 College of Nursing, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA
  2. 2 Department of Nutritional Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA
  3. 3 Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, University of North Florida Brooks College of Health, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
  4. 4 Moffit Cancer Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
  1. Correspondence to Mrs Laura A Robinson; lad0030{at}auburn.edu

Abstract

Introduction Military veterans are at greater risk for chronic medical conditions, many of which are associated with greater body mass index (BMI). Detrimental changes to diet and physical activity (PA) levels after separation from military service contribute to this disparity which may be mitigated by nutrition education (NE) during service.

Methods We conducted a survey in student veterans attending two southeastern US universities to determine current nutrition knowledge and hypothesised that NE received during time of service would be associated with better current diet quality (DQ), PA and BMI. Food group knowledge (FGK), and nutrient knowledge, DQ measured by Healthy Eating Index (HEI), and PA reported in metabolic equivalent minutes per week (MET-min/week) were assessed using previously validated questionnaires. Height and weight were also self-reported to calculate BMI. Differences in these variables between NE groups were assessed using Mann-Whitney U tests. Change in DQ, PA and BMI were assessed with Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Stepwise backward regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors related to HEI and BMI status.

Results Sixty-three out of 83 total responses were valid. Respondents were 60% male, 81% white, 43% and 27% served in the Army and Navy, respectively and 30% reported receiving NE while in the military. Veterans who received NE while serving did not have higher FGK, nutrition knowledge, current DQ, MET-min/week or BMI than their counterparts. Overall, respondents reported decreased MET-min/week (p<0.001), increased BMI (p=0.01) and no change in DQ. PA (p=0.014) and FGK (p<0.001) were significant predictors of current DQ, while no variables significantly predicted current BMI.

Conclusions Inverse relationships between BMI and PA were observed after separation from duty. These results warrant the development and implementation of effective lifestyle interventions in veterans to prevent chronic disease and improve quality of life.

  • nutrition & dietetics
  • public health

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors CRC acquired and processed survey data from University of North Florida veterans. LR, ADF and KSS compiled validated resources to compose demographic, military history, nutrition knowledge, food group knowledge and dietary and physical activity survey questions. ADF and LR analysed and interpreted participant data regarding diet quality, physical activity and nutrition knowledge and were major contributors in writing the manuscript. MWG contributed to statistical analysis protocols and reviewed manuscript. ADF and MWG supervised the study. LR acted as guarantor. LR, ADF, MWG, KSS, CRC reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.