Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Return to duty after non-surgical treatment of a non-neurological thoracic or lumbar spine fracture in French military patients: a retrospective analysis of 54 patients
  1. J-B Lines1,
  2. P J Cungi2,
  3. C Da Silva1,
  4. L Aigle1,3,
  5. A Dagain1,4 and
  6. C Joubert1,4
  1. 1Ecole du Val-de-Grace, Paris, France
  2. 2Intensive Care ans Anesthesiology, Sainte-Anne Military Teaching Hospital, Toulon, France
  3. 311(th) Military Medical Center, Toulouse, France
  4. 4Neurosurgery, Sainte Anne Military Teaching Hospital, Toulon, France
  1. Correspondence to Pr C Joubert; christophe.joubert{at}neurochirurgie.fr

Abstract

Introduction Non-surgical management of non-neurological thoracic or lumbar spine (TL) fractures seems to provide good results in the civilian population, leading to return to work in most cases. However, data on the military population are limited, particularly regarding return to duty. This study aimed to describe a population of French military patients with traumatic non-neurological TL fractures and the outcomes of non-surgical management regarding operational capacity.

Materials and methods This retrospective single-centre observational study used data from military patients followed for non-neurological TL fractures, from the date of the trauma or after treatment in another civilian or military care facility. Medical fitness status at 1 year was the primary outcome. Medical fitness status at 1 year was defined as unrestricted resumption and restricted resumption in cases of return to duty in a different role or in the previous role with restrictions.

Results Between January 2010 and December 2020, 93 patients presented with non-neurological traumatic TL fractures at Sainte-Anne National Military Hospital. Fifty-four records met the inclusion criteria. Falls from high heights (27.8%, n=15) and road accidents (24.1%, n=13) were the most common traumatic mechanisms. The remaining 77 injuries were compression fractures, predominantly at the thoracolumbar junction. One year after trauma, 90.7% of patients (n=49) had returned to duty, and 77.8% (n=42) were free from medical restriction. The median duration of incapacity (MDI) was 173 days. Age significantly affected medical fitness at 1 year (p=0.019); however, it did not affect the MDI. Polytrauma was significantly associated with a lower resumption rate at 1 year (53.3%, p=0.007).

Conclusion Non-surgical management of non-neurological TL fractures allowed unrestricted return to duty in this population. These clinically relevant trends have led to perspectives for defining non-surgical treatment indications, means and goals.

  • Spine
  • Military Personnel
  • Neurosurgery
  • TRAUMA MANAGEMENT
  • REHABILITATION MEDICINE
  • ANAESTHETICS

Data availability statement

No data are available.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors JBL, PJC, CDS, LA, AD and CJ were involved in the planning, conduct and reporting of the work. LA, AD and CJ provided oversight to set research objectives and supported choice of appropriate method. Data search was conducted by JBL and CDS. Analysis was conducted by JBL, PJC and LA with review and comments from AD and CJ. JBL wrote the first and final drafts of the manuscript. PJC, LA, AD and CJ reviewed the initial and final drafts of the manuscript. CJ is the guarantor of the study.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer-reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.